Many assume falsely that religious disagreements engage rules of evidence presentation and belief justification radically different than the ordinary disagreeme
Every known religious or explicitly irreligious outlook is contested by large contingents of informed and reasonable people. Many philosophers have argued that
This Element examines what we can learn from religious disagreement, focusing on disagreement with possible selves and former selves, the epistemic significance
This book develops an inductive risk account of the limits of reasonable religious disagreement. The riskiness of different people’s methods for forming relig
Epistemological questions about the significance of disagreement have advanced alongside broader developments in social epistemology concerning testimony, the n