Great Australian Dissents

Great Australian Dissents
Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Total Pages : 393
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781107158535
ISBN-13 : 1107158532
Rating : 4/5 (532 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Great Australian Dissents by : Andrew Lynch

Download or read book Great Australian Dissents written by Andrew Lynch and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2016-09-08 with total page 393 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.


Great Australian Dissents Related Books

Great Australian Dissents
Language: en
Pages: 393
Authors: Andrew Lynch
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-09-08 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.
Keywords in Australian Politics
Language: en
Pages: 248
Authors: Rodney Smith
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2006-06-13 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Publisher description
The Great Dissenter
Language: en
Pages: 624
Authors: Peter S. Canellos
Categories: Biography & Autobiography
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-06-28 - Publisher: Simon and Schuster

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The story of an American hero who stood against all the forces of Gilded Age America to help enshrine our civil rights and economic freedoms. Dissent. No one wi
Great Australian Dissents
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Andrew Lynch
Categories: Dissenting opinions
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.
The Intricacies of Dicta and Dissent
Language: en
Pages: 513
Authors: Neil Duxbury
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-08-12 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements that they need not have made had they kept strictly to the task