Download or read book An Analysis of the Relationship of Perceived Principal Instructional Leadership Behaviors and Student Academic Achievement at the Elementary Level written by Jonathan L. Purser and published by . This book was released on 2018 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The primary purpose of this study was to determine if relationships existed between the 21 instructional leadership behaviors identified by Marzano, Waters, and McNulty (2005) and elementary student academic achievement in the areas of reading, writing, and science as measured by the state accountability test (STAAR). A total of 25 principals representing 25 elementary school campuses completed the Adapted School Leadership Behaviors Survey (ASLBS). This survey was adapted from the School Leadership Behaviors Survey (SLBS) Schindler (2012) and used to assess principal self-perceptions of the 21 instructional leadership behaviors as they relate to campus student achievement. Correlational analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship between elementary school principals’ perception of their 21 instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement as measured by the state assessment (STAAR) Percent at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard or Above (Sum of All Grades Tested) in the subjects of reading, writing, and science. The findings of the study would suggest that there were some weak uphill (positive) relationships between the 21 instructional leadership behaviors and campus student achievement. However overall the correlations found could be described as having a range between no linear relationship and a moderate downhill (negative) relationship. For purposes of this study, correlations where -.30 ≤ r ≤.30 were deemed too small to discuss in detail but are included in the statistical tables for reference. Negative notable correlations were found between the instructional leadership behaviors of change agent, contingent rewards, flexibility, intellectual stimulation, involvement in curriculum and instruction optimizer, and outreach and one or more of the STAAR tested subjects of reading, writing, and science. Of all the positively correlated, none were statistically significant. The leadership behavior of Change Agent was negatively correlated to writing (r = -.518) and statistically significant (p=.008). The leadership behavior of Contingent Rewards was negatively correlated to science (r = -.412) and statistically significant (p=.041). The leadership behavior of Involvement in Curriculum was positively correlated to writing (r = -.419) and statistically significant (p=.037). These three leadership behaviors showed a moderate downhill (negative) relationship to campus academic achievement. Of the three correlations which were found to be negative and at a statistically significant level (p≤ .05), the greatest negative correlation found was where r = -.518 which is still a very small correlation. The sample size was such that relationships were found, but significance would not be generalizable.