Great Australian Dissents

Great Australian Dissents
Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Total Pages : 393
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781107158535
ISBN-13 : 1107158532
Rating : 4/5 (532 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Great Australian Dissents by : Andrew Lynch

Download or read book Great Australian Dissents written by Andrew Lynch and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2016-09-08 with total page 393 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.


Great Australian Dissents Related Books

Great Australian Dissents
Language: en
Pages: 393
Authors: Andrew Lynch
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-09-08 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

When judges disagree, those in the minority write a dissenting opinion. This book considers the great dissents in Australian law. Their worth may derive from nu
Great Australian Dissents
Language: en
Pages: 393
Authors: Andrew Lynch
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-09-08 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.
Keywords in Australian Politics
Language: en
Pages: 248
Authors: Rodney Smith
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2006-06-13 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Publisher description
Great Australian Dissents
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Andrew Lynch
Categories: Dissenting opinions
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book identifies, analyses and celebrates the significant and influential dissenting judicial opinions in Australian legal history.
The Intricacies of Dicta and Dissent
Language: en
Pages: 513
Authors: Neil Duxbury
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-08-12 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements that they need not have made had they kept strictly to the task