Lessons from voluntary partnership agreements for REDD+ benefit sharing
Author | : Cecilia Luttrell |
Publisher | : CIFOR |
Total Pages | : 28 |
Release | : 2015-09-17 |
ISBN-10 | : 9786023870080 |
ISBN-13 | : 6023870082 |
Rating | : 4/5 (082 Downloads) |
Download or read book Lessons from voluntary partnership agreements for REDD+ benefit sharing written by Cecilia Luttrell and published by CIFOR. This book was released on 2015-09-17 with total page 28 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The experience of FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreements offer several lessons on how to design benefit sharing mechanisms under REDD+ so that they build credibility and trust among the potential recipients of REDD+ benefits. This paper focuses on lessons for three specific design aspects of REDD+ benefit-sharing mechanisms: (i) the balance between state and non-state actors in the architecture of benefit-sharing mechanism institutions; (ii) the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in monitoring; and (iii) the design of multistakeholder processes. The choice and arrangement of institutions and actors is crucial for credibility: independence can be enhanced or reduced by the architecture of check and balance mechanisms and the type of actors involved. Lessons from VPAs also highlight the trade-off between the cost efficiency and capacity building gains of using existing (often state) institutions and actors versus the potential increased effectiveness and independence that may be provided by new and/or non-state institutions and actors. The use of civil society monitors and multistakeholder processes can provide credibility through enhancing accountability and transparency as well as increasing commitment and confidence in the system. The impact of civil society monitoring can be enhanced by formal recognition of its role, establishing complaints mechanisms and formalizing access to information. Multistakeholder processes can be strengthened by clarifying roles, responsibilities and decision-making mandates of the process; clarifying who should be included; accepting that such processes take time; and maintaining technical and financial support.